ShapeShapeauthorShapecrossShapeShapeShapeGrouphamburgerhomeGroupmagnifyShapeShapeShapeShape
Sponsor message
A healthy weight starts with healthy habits

Veterinary drug residues in our food chain?

by
01 May 2013, at 12:00am

NICOLA KANE of Randox Food Diagnostics discusses the threat of drug residues and the need for rigorous testing to provide a complete picture of the food supply chain

IN modern food markets consumers are putting an increasing focus on the quality of their food. In order to keep this quality to the highest standard it is vital that food safety testing is rigorous and provides a complete picture of the food supply chain, including safety and traceability.

Regular food screening for chemical residues such as antibiotics, growth promoting steroids and other chemical contaminants should play a key role in protecting the consumer. This screening ensures that only the highest quality products reach the food chain, producing a complete safety profile for all food products.

With many food producers trying to meet customer demands for low cost products, the quality of food testing can suffer which could result in foods unsafe for human consumption reaching the supermarket shelves.

The threat of drug residues in food is causing increased concern globally; therefore, the presence of anabolic steroids including beta agonists such as clenbuterol and ractopamine, as well as other veterinary drugs such as phenylbutazone, is under a strict monitoring programme in meat and animal feed. Other food that comes under scrutiny in particular for the presence of antibiotics includes milk, honey and eggs.

As a result of the concern of excessive use of these drugs and the possible adverse effects on human health, many countries have set maximum residue limits (MRLs) or tolerances for these residues in food. The MRL is the maximum concentration of a residue that can be present in a product from an animal or animal byproduct intended for the food supply.

These MRLs mean that it is required by law in the enforcing countries that any product in the food chain cannot contain residue levels that are harmful to human health above these limits.

Drugs like clenbuterol, ractopamine and phenylbutazone can have serious implications for human health if consumed in quantities exceeding these recommended safe MRLs.

Effects on human health

Clenbuterol is used to induce weight gain in food animals. It can cause various health concerns for humans. Consumption exceeding the MRL can lead to “mild” effects such as hospitalisation with reversible symptoms of increased heart rate, muscular tremors, headache, nausea, fever, and chills.

It has to be noted, however, that people who are sensitive to this drug could be far more severely affected by clenbuterol residues in food than the general population.

Ractopamine is a more controversial drug as its use is permitted in food production in some countries like the US and Canada, but the European Union, China, Taiwan and over 100 other countries have banned its use.

Ractopamine is used to increase weight gain or leanness in beef and pork animals for the food supply; it is used extensively in the US where it is considered safe, which has led to recent trade disputes between the US and countries banning the use of ractopamine.

The European Union Food Safety Authority has conducted studies into the effect on humans and results stated that the drugs can cause a range of side effects including: tachycardia (fast heart rate, over 100 beats per minute), vasodilation, skeletal muscle tremor, nervousness, metabolic disturbances such as hyperglycaemia and hypokalaemia.

Because of these possible side effects, the EU has rejected the MRL proposed by the UN’s Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives and said there is no current way of calculating a safe ractopamine residue limit for human consumption with the studies that have been conducted.

Phenylbutazone, commonly known as bute, has potentially more serious implications on human health than clenbuterol and ractopamine. Bute was originally used as a treatment for rheumatoid arthritis in humans in the 1950s but was removed as a result of its effects on human health.

Bute has been linked with the development of blood disorders, including aplastic anaemia, leukopaenia, agranulocytosis and thrombocytopaenia. It has also been known to be a carcinogen in rats but has not been conclusively proven to have this effect in humans.

Whilst the presence of antibiotics in the food system is a major threat to damaging human health, this is no longer the only issue. Recently, the chief medical officer of England, Dame Sally Davies, has raised awareness of the issue of antibiotic resistance and the serious threat it poses to the future of human medical care.

With an increased level of antibiotics used in food production, human consumption of regular antibiotics is increasing. This means that when producers do not meet MRLs, humans are consuming levels of antibiotics when they are not needed, causing an antibiotic resistance. Recent media have highlighted that this can lead to antibiotics losing effectiveness at treating infections.

Without antibiotics available to treat infections, having simple surgery could become a life-threatening procedure. This antibiotic resistance has the potential to be a lot more dangerous than simply being exposed to adverse side effects of the antimicrobial drugs.

Importance of testing

The potential human health risks highlight the importance of complete food safety testing before a food product reaches the public.

Globally, food scares are all too common. In 2011 China discovered that Chinese pork products tainted with clenbuterol had entered the food supply. Ractopamine levels in US meat led to a ban on food products in 2012 containing traces of the drug in Russia. Then in early 2013 it was highlighted that traces of phenylbutazone were found in horsemeat destined for the European food chain.

This phenylbutazone scare happened in the midst of a scandal involving the mislabelling of horsemeat as beef in the European food supply. This and previous scares serve to highlight the need for a much more robust food safety testing system that includes traceability as well as safety, allowing the consumer to know a food’s origin as well as what it contains.

With this in mind, concern has been raised over the possible presence of phenylbutazone within the mislabelled horsemeat.

European law around the slaughter of horses requires that all horses have a passport declaring whether they are destined for the food chain or not. Those horses that are for human consumption are then only allowed a limited number of medicinal substances: phenylbutazone is not on this approved list.

Even with these measures in place, between 2% and 5% of horse meat samples have tested positive for traces of bute in the UK. With traces of bute being found in horses destined for the food chain, there is a possibility of bute also being present in some of this mislabelled beef.

Test methods

Phenylbutazone screening methods are limited with a large proportion of testing being carried out by costly and lengthy confirmatory methods such as HPLC, GCMS and LC/MS.

An ELISA screening test to detect phenylbutazone in serum and horse tissue is available from Randox Food Diagnostics. This ELISA has excellent limits of detection at 2ng/ml in serum and 1.0ng/g in tissue. Additional ELISA test kits offered include beta agonist, clenbuterol, ractopa-mine and many other veterinary drugs, all of which offer low limits of detection with minimal sample preparations.

ELISA screening methods offer an excellent way for food producers and processors to conduct their own in-house screening to ensure that the quality of their food has not been compromised by drug residues administered earlier in the food chain.

Sample preparations required for rapid drug residue tests such as dipsticks, lateral flow devices and receptor binding assays along with ELISAs often require a low level of technical expertise and reduced consumable costs.

ELISA screening along with the revolutionary multi-analyte biochip array technology offer the same advantages as the rapid test kits. However, they also have the ability to provide quantitative sample concentrations with a high sample throughput which allows the end user to have a high degree of control.

Biochip array technology is now used by many governmental institutes worldwide and has been reported to provide a reliable and efficient way to screen samples for residues of multiple veterinary drugs.

Biochip technology provides a platform that enables the simultaneous determination of multiple veterinary drugs in a single sample using a single sample preparation. It uses miniaturised assay procedures which reduce the sample/reagent consumption and costeffectiveness of the tests.

The technology is based upon welltested and reliable ELISA principles of sandwich and competitive immunoassays. Multiple specific ligands (antibodies or antigens) are attached at pre-defined discrete test regions on the surface of the biochip (similar to antibodies on a microtitre plate).

Any veterinary drug present in a sample leads to binding of conjugate labelled with horseradish peroxidase (HRP). The addition of signal reagent leads to generation of a light signal and analysis of results completed via the Evidence Investigator analyser.

Conclusion

No matter what test screening method is chosen, it is important that residues of veterinary drugs are at the forefront of any food safety initiative. The percentage of food scares should be decreased to allow consumers a high degree of confidence in all foodstuffs consumed on a regular basis.

Modern techniques now available commercially, such as the biochip array technology, allow for the presence of multiple drugs to be tested rapidly, ensuring that any positive samples are eliminated from the food chain prior to any scares being highlighted in the media.

Sources

www.fsis.usda.gov/oa/backgroun...

www.decodedscience.com/ractopa...

www.huffingtonpost.com/andrewg...

www.sciencemediacentre.org/wpc...

www.guardian.co.uk/lifeandstyle/2013/mar/antibiotic-resistance-war-againstsuperbugs.

Sponsor message

Royal Canin® Diabetic

Overweight pets are more predisposed to developing diabetes mellitus. In the case of a diabetic pet, dietary management is of major importance along with appropriate medical care.

Find out more